Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-16 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Capri blue and Smoke black | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 237.00 | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition is just a bit better than the Motorola Moto G8 Power, with an 80.4 score against 76. The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition is an older device than the Motorola Moto G8 Power, but Samsung made it thinner and somewhat lighter anyway. Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a little sharper display than Moto G8 Power, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and more pixels per inch in the screen.
Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a bit superior processor than Motorola Moto G8 Power. Both have 8 cpu cores and the same RAM memory amount. Moto G8 Power takes just a bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a tinier sensor, and they both have the same aperture, the same video quality and the same video frame rate, the Moto G8 Power also counts with a way higher resolution camera in the back.
Moto G8 Power has a bit bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Moto G8 Power also has a SD memory slot that supports up to 512 GB. The Motorola Moto G8 Power counts with a superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3200mAh.
Although Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Motorola Moto G8 Power, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola Moto G8 Power. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get Motorola Moto G8 Power, and give up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.