Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-16 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Capri blue and Smoke black | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 237.00 | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 is better than Moto G8 Power, getting a general score of 89 against 76. Although Galaxy Note10 and the Moto G8 Power were only released 8 months apart, Galaxy Note10 is somewhat lighter and thinner. Galaxy Note10 features a bit faster processing unit than Moto G8 Power, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Note10 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy Note10 features a little more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G8 Power, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2280, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch of screen. Samsung Galaxy Note10 shoots a little bit better videos and photos than Motorola Moto G8 Power, because although it has a back facing camera with a lot worse 12 megapixels resolution and a lower video resolution, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture for better photos in low light situations and a bigger camera sensor.
The Galaxy Note10 counts with a bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto G8 Power, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory. Moto G8 Power features a much longer battery life than Galaxy Note10, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Moto G8 Power, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto G8 Power. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy Moto G8 Power, and give up some specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.