Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2013-09-25 |
| 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Capri blue and Smoke black | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 237.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note3 is just a bit better than Moto G8 Power, getting a score of 77.7 against 76. Samsung Galaxy Note3's construction is lighter and somewhat thinner than the Moto G8 Power, even though it was released 7 years before. These phones use Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Note3 has 4.4.2 version while Moto G8 Power has Android 10 version, counting with some nice extra features and some performance improvements.
The Moto G8 Power has a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy Note3, because it has a slightly higher 1080 x 2300px resolution, a quite larger screen and a little bit greater screen density. The Motorola Moto G8 Power has a bit better processing unit than Galaxy Note3, because it has 1 GB more RAM memory and 4 more CPU cores (but slower).
The Moto G8 Power counts with a little bit better camera than Galaxy Note3, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same video definition, the Moto G8 Power also has a bigger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a back camera with more megapixels and a way larger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light images and video.
The Moto G8 Power features much more memory for applications and games than Galaxy Note3, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory, the Moto G8 Power also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 512 GB. The Moto G8 Power counts with a much better battery performance than Galaxy Note3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.