Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-16 | 2016-08-02 |
| 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Capri blue and Smoke black | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 237.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note7 is just a bit better than Moto G8 Power, having a 79.5 score against 76. Samsung Galaxy Note7's construction is thinner and somewhat lighter than the Moto G8 Power, despite of the fact that it was released 4 years before. Moto G8 Power has just a bit better performance than Galaxy Note7, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Moto G8 Power also has 4 more cpu cores.
Samsung Galaxy Note7 features a bit better screen than Motorola Moto G8 Power, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a better count of pixels per display inch. The Motorola Moto G8 Power counts with just a bit more memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy Note7, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Motorola Moto G8 Power also has an external memory slot that allows up to 512 GB.
The Motorola Moto G8 Power has a really longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because it has a 43% more battery size. The Moto G8 Power takes clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor which gives a lower image and video quality, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the Moto G8 Power also counts with a camera in the back with lot more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.