Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Capri blue and Smoke black | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 237.00 | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is better than Moto G8 Power, having a 90.8 score against 76. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a newer 11 version while Moto G8 Power has Android 10, providing you a lot of extra features. The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is a a bit lighter and somewhat thinner cellphone than Moto G8 Power, even when both of them were released with only 6 months difference.
Galaxy S20 FE features a little faster processing unit than Moto G8 Power, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 FE also has a larger amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with a bit sharper screen than Moto G8 Power, because it has a quite larger display, a little greater screen density and a little higher 1080 x 2400 resolution.
The Galaxy S20 FE features just a bit better camera than Moto G8 Power, because although it has a worse video definition, a much worse 12 megapixels resolution camera and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for taking photographs and/or video in low-light situations, it also counts with a way bigger back camera sensor.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a lot bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto G8 Power, because it has a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1000 GB and 64 GB more internal storage. The Moto G8 Power features just a bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE costs a lot more money than the Moto G8 Power, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.