Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 89.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2022-01-11 |
| 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.13 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Capri blue and Smoke black | -- |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Metal and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 237.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S21 FE is much better than Moto G8 Power, with a score of 89.1 against 76. These phones work with Android operating system, but Galaxy S21 FE has 11 version and Moto G8 Power has Android 10, so it provides a couple additional features and performance improvements. The Galaxy S21 FE is a newer cellphone, and it is also lighter and somewhat thinner than Moto G8 Power.
The Samsung Galaxy S21 FE features just a bit better looking screen than Moto G8 Power, and although they both have a same size screen, the Samsung Galaxy S21 FE also has a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a bit greater pixels amount in each inch of display. The Moto G8 Power features a quite bigger storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy S21 FE, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 512 GB.
Galaxy S21 FE counts with a little better performance than Moto G8 Power, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy S21 FE also has more RAM. The Moto G8 Power captures slightly better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S21 FE, because although it has lower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Moto G8 Power also counts with a back facing camera with much more megapixels and a bigger aperture to capture better low light images and videos.
The Moto G8 Power features a bit longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S21 FE, because it has an 11% greater battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy S21 FE is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Moto G8 Power, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Moto G8 Power. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get the Moto G8 Power, letting go some specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.