Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Capri blue and Smoke black | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 237.00 | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 is much better than Motorola Moto G8 Power, having a score of 93.4 against 76. The Galaxy S22 is a newer phone, and it's also lighter and way thinner than Motorola Moto G8 Power. Both devices in our current comparison work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S22 has a newer 13 version while Motorola Moto G8 Power has Android 10 version, providing you some extra features.
Galaxy S22 counts with an incredibly better screen than Moto G8 Power, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little higher 1080 x 2340px resolution and a little bit greater pixels number in each inch in the display. The Moto G8 Power has a bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S22, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy S22 has just a bit better hardware performance than Moto G8 Power, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S22 also has a greater amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy S22 shoots a lot better photos and videos than Motorola Moto G8 Power, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for taking pictures in low light situations, it also counts with a way higher 7680x4320 video definition, a lot higher 50 megapixels resolution back-facing camera and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor.
The Moto G8 Power counts with longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S22, because it has a 35% greater battery size.
Galaxy S22 costs a lot more than Motorola Moto G8 Power, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.