Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Capri blue and Smoke black | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 237.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra has a global score of 95.4, which is a lot better than the Moto G8 Power's 76 general score. These phones have Android operating system, but Galaxy S22 Ultra has 13 version and Moto G8 Power has Android 10 version. Although Galaxy S22 Ultra is heavier than the Moto G8 Power, it's just a little bit thinner and also newer.
Galaxy S22 Ultra has just a bit better performance than Motorola Moto G8 Power, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has 4 GB more RAM memory. Galaxy S22 Ultra features a much sharper display than Moto G8 Power, because it has a greater screen density, a quite bigger display and a better 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution.
Galaxy S22 Ultra shoots greater photos and videos than Moto G8 Power, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low-light captures and video, it also counts with a much larger sensor, a camera in the back with much more mega-pixels and a lot better 7680x4320 video definition.
Moto G8 Power features a quite bigger memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a battery duration that is just as good as the battery lifetime in Moto G8 Power.
Although Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola Moto G8 Power, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola Moto G8 Power. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Galaxy S22 Ultra, else you can save some money and get the Motorola Moto G8 Power, resigning a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.