Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-04-16 | -- |
| 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | -- |
| 6.95 ounces | -- |
| Capri blue and Smoke black | -- |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 237.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 is a bit better than Moto G8 Power, having a overall score of 82.6 against 76. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S25 has the newer 14 version while Moto G8 Power has Android 10 version, giving you some extra features and performance enhancements. Galaxy S25 is a incredibly lighter and extremely thinner cellphone than the Moto G8 Power.
Galaxy S25 features a much better screen than Motorola Moto G8 Power, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher number of pixels per inch in the screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels. The Moto G8 Power features a greater memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S25, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
Motorola Moto G8 Power counts with a very superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Galaxy S25 has a lot better camera than Motorola Moto G8 Power, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a back facing camera with a way better resolution, a way higher 7680x4320 video definition and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor providing a way higher image quality.
Moto G8 Power counts with improved battery duration than Galaxy S25, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Although Galaxy S25 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola Moto G8 Power, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola Moto G8 Power. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy the Motorola Moto G8 Power, and give up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.