Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 5.0 |
| 2020-04-16 | -- |
| 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | -- |
| Capri blue and Smoke black | -- |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 237.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S6 Active is a bit better than the Moto G8 Power, having a score of 80.9 against 76. Both of these devices use Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S6 Active has 5.0 version and Moto G8 Power has Android 10. Samsung Galaxy S6 Active's construction is just a bit thinner and extremely lighter than the Moto G8 Power.
Galaxy S6 Active has an incredibly better screen than Motorola Moto G8 Power, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and a greater pixel density. The Moto G8 Power has a superior storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has 64 GB internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S6 Active features a more powerful processor than Moto G8 Power, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, and they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy S6 Active also counts with a 64-bits processor and a GPU. Moto G8 Power has a much better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3500mAh.
Moto G8 Power counts with a superior camera than Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor which offers a worse photo and video quality, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, a camera with a 16 mega pixels resolution and the same video frame rates, the Moto G8 Power also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture for better photography and video in low light situations.
The Samsung Galaxy S6 Active is a little more expensive than Moto G8 Power, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.