Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-16 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Capri blue and Smoke black | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 237.00 | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S7 is a little bit better than Motorola Moto G8 Power, having a general score of 79.5 against 76. The Galaxy S7 is an incredibly older phone than the Motorola Moto G8 Power, but Samsung managed to make it noticeably lighter and thinner. Motorola Moto G8 Power has a bit better processor than Samsung Galaxy S7, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Motorola Moto G8 Power also has more cores (although slower).
The Samsung Galaxy S7 has a lot better display than Moto G8 Power, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixels count in each display inch and a better 1440 x 2560px resolution. The Moto G8 Power features a way bigger memory for applications and games than Galaxy S7, because it has 64 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 512 GB.
Moto G8 Power has a very superior battery lifetime than Galaxy S7, because it has a 67 percent larger battery size. Moto G8 Power has just a bit better camera than Galaxy S7, because although it has a smaller sensor, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the same video frame rate and a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the Moto G8 Power also counts with a lot higher 16 mega-pixels resolution back camera.
The Galaxy S7 is not only the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones, making this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.