Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-16 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Capri blue and Smoke black | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 237.00 | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G8 Power has a global score of 76, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active's score of 75.8. Even though Motorola Moto G8 Power is a little heavier than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, it's a little bit thinner and also newer. The Moto G8 Power has a little better processing power than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Moto G8 Power also has more cores.
The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active counts with a more vivid display than Moto G8 Power, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixels amount in each display inch and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution. The Moto G8 Power has a bit better camera than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same aperture, the Moto G8 Power also has a camera with lot more megapixels.
The Moto G8 Power counts with a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB and 32 GB more internal memory. Moto G8 Power features superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Even being the best phone in this comparison, the Moto G8 Power is also cheaper than the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.