Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-16 | 2017-08-11 |
| 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Capri blue and Smoke black | Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 237.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S8 Active has a general score of 81.9, which is a little bit better than the Moto G8 Power's 76 score. Despite being the best phone we compare here, Galaxy S8 Active's body is older, just a little thicker and a bit heavier than the Moto G8 Power. Samsung Galaxy S8 Active has a sharper screen than Moto G8 Power, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a greater screen pixel density and a better 1440 x 2960 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S8 Active features a bit better CPU than Moto G8 Power. Both of them have 4 GB of RAM memory and 8 CPU cores. The Moto G8 Power features just a bit better camera than Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has a tinier sensor, and they both have a same size camera aperture, the same video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Moto G8 Power also counts with a camera with a way better resolution.
Motorola Moto G8 Power features a slightly bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Motorola Moto G8 Power also has a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 512 GB. Moto G8 Power features better battery lifetime than Galaxy S8 Active, because it has a 25 percent larger battery size.
Galaxy S8 Active is a little more expensive than Moto G8 Power, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.