Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-04-16 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Capri blue and Smoke black | Black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| $ 237.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 397 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a global score of 80.1, which is a bit better than the Moto G8 Power's score of 76. Despite being the best cellphone in our current comparison, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a way heavier and thicker cellphone than Moto G8 Power. Both phones we are comparing have Android OS, but the Galaxy XCover FieldPro has 8.0 Oreo version and Moto G8 Power has Android 10, providing the user a couple additional features and performance enhancements.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a more vivid display than Moto G8 Power, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixel density and a higher 1440 x 2560px resolution. Motorola Moto G8 Power and Galaxy XCover FieldPro count with similar memory to store more apps and games, both have a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB and the same internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a little better hardware performance than Moto G8 Power. They have the same number of cores and 4 GB of RAM. Moto G8 Power has a little better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. Moto G8 Power features a lot better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller sensor offering a lower image quality and a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a way more megapixels camera and a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
Although Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola Moto G8 Power, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola Moto G8 Power. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy Motorola Moto G8 Power, letting go a few features and specifications, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.