Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Capri blue and Smoke black | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum |
| $ 237.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a score of 92.3, which is way better than Moto G8 Power's 76 score. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G construction is much thinner and a little lighter than Moto G8 Power, although they were released only a couple months apart. Both of these devices work with Android OS, but the Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a newer 11 version and Moto G8 Power has Android 10, so it provides the user a couple nice extra features.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Moto G8 Power, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a bit sharper screen than Motorola Moto G8 Power, because it has a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2636px, a just a little higher screen density and a little bit larger display.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with more storage for games and applications than Moto G8 Power, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G takes slightly better pictures and videos than Moto G8 Power, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for shooting photographs in low-light situations, a back camera with a much lower 12 mega-pixels resolution and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, it also counts with a bigger camera sensor.
The Moto G8 Power counts with a way better battery life than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is way more expensive than Moto G8 Power, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.