Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-05 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.35 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.64 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Neon blue and Pearl white | Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 237.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone X is better than Moto G8, getting a general score of 88.1 against 74.4. The Apple iPhone X construction is thinner and just a little lighter than Moto G8, although it was released 2 years before. Apple iPhone X counts with a way better screen than Moto G8, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a much better 1125 x 2436px resolution and a lot better count of pixels per inch in the display.
Apple iPhone X counts with a better processor than Motorola Moto G8, because although it has less RAM memory and a lower number of cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a 64-bit CPU. The Apple iPhone X features a bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto G8, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory.
Moto G8 has a much longer battery performance than Apple iPhone X, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2716mAh. The Apple iPhone X counts with a bit better camera than Motorola Moto G8, although it has a tinier aperture, a camera in the back with a way lower 12 mega-pixels resolution and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
Although iPhone X is a better device, it costs a lot more than Motorola Moto G8, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola Moto G8. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy iPhone X, else you can save some dollars and buy the Motorola Moto G8, resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.