Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-05 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.35 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.64 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Neon blue and Pearl white | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 237.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 is just a bit better than the Motorola Moto G8, having a overall score of 80 against 74.4. The Google Pixel 3 body is much lighter and thinner than the Motorola Moto G8, although it was released only 17 months before. Google Pixel 3 features a brighter display than Moto G8, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher pixels number per inch of display and a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2160px.
The Motorola Moto G8 has a very superior memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Motorola Moto G8 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 512 GB. The Google Pixel 3 has a bit superior CPU than Moto G8. Both of them have 4 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core processor.
The Moto G8 features a superior battery duration than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 2915mAh. Google Pixel 3 has a camera that is just as good as the Moto G8 one, although the Google Pixel 3 has a worse 3840x2160 video quality, a tinier aperture which is not nice for taking photographs or videos in low light environments and a camera with a way lower 12.2 megapixels resolution.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the Google Pixel 3 is also a bargain compared to the other ones, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.