Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-05 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.35 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.64 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Neon blue and Pearl white | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 237.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 is much better than Moto G8, having an 81.9 score against 74.4. Google Pixel 4's construction is lighter and a bit thinner than the Moto G8, although both were only released with a couple of months difference. The Google Pixel 4 has a little better processing power than Moto G8, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Google Pixel 4 also has a greater amount of RAM.
Google Pixel 4 counts with a better looking screen than Motorola Moto G8, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way better 1080 x 2280 resolution and a much higher display pixel density. The Google Pixel 4 counts with a camera that is just as good as Moto G8's camera, and although the Google Pixel 4 has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a lot lower resolution camera, they both have a same size aperture.
The Motorola Moto G8 has a way bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Motorola Moto G8 also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 512 GB. The Motorola Moto G8 counts with a way better battery life than Google Pixel 4, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
The Google Pixel 4 is way more expensive than the Moto G8, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.