Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.35 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.64 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Neon blue and Pearl white | Just black |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 237.00 | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a is much better than the Moto G8, with an 82.9 score against 74.4. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but Google Pixel 4a has a newer 11 version and Moto G8 has Android 10. The Google Pixel 4a is a incredibly lighter and a bit thinner device than the Moto G8, although both of them were released only a few months apart.
The Google Pixel 4a counts with a bit better processor than Moto G8, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Google Pixel 4a also has a greater amount of RAM. Google Pixel 4a has a sharper display than Motorola Moto G8, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a much higher pixel count per inch in the screen and a way better 1080 x 2340 resolution.
Google Pixel 4a's camera is just as good as Motorola Moto G8's camera, and although the Google Pixel 4a has a lower video definition and a back-facing camera with way less megapixels, they both have a F1.7 aperture. Motorola Moto G8 features a greater storage to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 512 GB.
Moto G8 counts with superior battery performance than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
The Google Pixel 4a costs a lot more than Moto G8, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.