Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-05 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.35 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.64 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Neon blue and Pearl white | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 237.00 | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 is much better than the Moto G8, having an 89 score against 74.4. The Google Pixel 5 design is lighter and somewhat thinner than the Moto G8, although they were released only 7 months apart. Google Pixel 5 features a bit better processing power than Moto G8, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 5 also has more RAM.
The Google Pixel 5 counts with a much better display than Moto G8, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher pixels amount per inch of screen and a way higher 1080 x 2340 resolution. The Google Pixel 5 features a little bit better camera than Motorola Moto G8, although it has a back-facing camera with a much worse 12.2 mega pixels resolution and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, they both have a same size diafragm aperture.
Moto G8 has a quite bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 5, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Google Pixel 5 counts with a bit longer battery performance than Moto G8, because it has a 2% larger battery capacity.
The Google Pixel 5 is way more expensive than the Moto G8, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.