Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | HTC |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-05 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.35 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.64 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Neon blue and Pearl white | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 237.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 5 |
| 268 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
HTC U Ultra has a score of 77, which is just a bit better than the Motorola Moto G8's 74.4 general score. HTC U Ultra's design is just a little bit lighter and thinner than the Motorola Moto G8, although it was released 3 years before. The HTC U Ultra counts with a much better display than Moto G8, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher pixel amount per screen inch and a much higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution.
HTC U Ultra counts with much more storage to install games and applications than Moto G8, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the HTC U Ultra also has an external SD slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. Moto G8 counts with a bit better hardware performance than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Moto G8 also has a higher number of cores.
The Motorola Moto G8 features better battery duration than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh. HTC U Ultra has just a bit better camera than Moto G8, although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for low-light images and videos, a way worse resolution back camera and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Although HTC U Ultra is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Moto G8, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Moto G8. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy HTC U Ultra, else you can save some dollars and buy the Moto G8, letting go some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.