Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-03-05 | 2018-06-01 |
| 6.35 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.64 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Neon blue and Pearl white | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 237.00 | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 268 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G7 ThinQ has an overall score of 81, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto G8's general score of 74.4. Both phones in this comparison include Android OS (operating system), but the LG G7 ThinQ has a more recent 9.0 Pie version while Motorola Moto G8 has Android 10, counting with a lot of extra features. The LG G7 ThinQ construction is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than Motorola Moto G8, despite of the fact that it was released about 21 months before.
LG G7 ThinQ features just a bit better performance than Motorola Moto G8. They have a 4 GB RAM and the same number of cores. LG G7 ThinQ features a much better looking display than Moto G8, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a much higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels and way more pixels per display inch.
The LG G7 ThinQ counts with a slightly better camera than Moto G8, and although they both have the same resolution back facing camera and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the LG G7 ThinQ also has a bigger aperture to capture better low-light photos and video and higher video frame rates. The LG G7 ThinQ has a much greater storage for games and applications than Motorola Moto G8, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the LG G7 ThinQ also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Moto G8 counts with greater battery performance than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, LG G7 ThinQ is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.