Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-05 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.35 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.64 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Neon blue and Pearl white | Black and Gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 237.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has a general score of 81.3, which is just a bit better than Motorola Moto G8's global score of 74.4. Even though LG V35 ThinQ is older than Motorola Moto G8, it's body is lighter and somewhat thinner. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a way better looking display than Moto G8, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher display pixel density and a much higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Moto G8, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB. The LG V35 ThinQ has a little bit better performance than Moto G8, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM.
Motorola Moto G8 counts with longer battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 21% bigger battery capacity. LG V35 ThinQ features a little bit better camera than Moto G8, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, a same resolution back-facing camera and the same video frame rate, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a larger aperture.
LG V35 ThinQ is a bit more expensive than the Moto G8, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.