Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.35 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.64 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Neon blue and Pearl white | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 237.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V40 ThinQ has an overall score of 81.2, which is slightly better than the Motorola Moto G8's 74.4 score. Even though the LG V40 ThinQ is older than Motorola Moto G8, it's construction is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter. Both phones in this review have the same Android 10 OS (Operating System).
The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a way better looking display than Motorola Moto G8, and although they both have a display of the same size, the LG V40 ThinQ also has much more pixels per inch of screen and a much higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels. LG V40 ThinQ has a very superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto G8, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG V40 ThinQ has a bit superior CPU than Moto G8, and although they both have 8 cores, the LG V40 ThinQ also has more RAM. LG V40 ThinQ has just a bit better camera than Motorola Moto G8, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a lot worse resolution camera, it also counts with a larger aperture.
Moto G8 has improved battery life than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, LG V40 ThinQ is also cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.