Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.35 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.64 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Neon blue and Pearl white | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Plastic | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 237.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is much better than the Moto G8, getting an 87.1 score against 74.4. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's body is incredibly newer and just a little bit thinner than the Moto G8's, but it is a bit heavier. These phones come with Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a newer 14 version and Moto G8 has Android 10, giving you a lot of extra features and enhanced performance.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much sharper screen than Motorola Moto G8, because it has a greater pixel density, a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a bit bigger screen. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto G8, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory.
The Motorola Moto G8 features a very superior processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra captures much clearer photographs and videos than Moto G8, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a back camera with a much better 50 MP resolution, faster 60 fps video frame rate and a larger aperture to take better photography in poorly lited environments.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a bit longer battery performance than Motorola Moto G8, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.