Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.35 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.64 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Neon blue and Pearl white | -- |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 237.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has an overall score of 79.4, which is a little bit better than the Moto G8's 74.4 global score. The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G design is noticeably newer and a bit thinner than the Moto G8's, although it's also just a little bit heavier. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has the newer 14 version while Moto G8 has Android 10.
The Moto G8 counts with a really superior performance than Galaxy A35 5G, although it has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Galaxy A35 5G features a sharper screen than Moto G8, because it has a much better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, a little bit larger display and a higher amount of pixels per inch of screen.
Moto G8 features a greater memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G counts with a superior camera than Moto G8, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for capturing photographs in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a much more MP back facing camera.
The Galaxy A35 5G has improved battery performance than Moto G8, because it has a 25 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.