Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-05 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.35 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.64 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Neon blue and Pearl white | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 237.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 has a general score of 83.8, which is much better than Motorola Moto G8's score of 74.4. The Galaxy A50 body is thinner and lighter than the Motorola Moto G8, despite of the fact that it was released around a year before. Galaxy A50 counts with a bit better processing unit than Motorola Moto G8. They have the same number of cores and a 4 GB RAM.
Galaxy A50 counts with a better looking screen than Motorola Moto G8, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Galaxy A50 also has a much greater pixels number per display inch and a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2340. The Galaxy A50 counts with a way bigger storage to install applications and games than Moto G8, and although they both have a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB, the Galaxy A50 also has 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 features a battery life that is very similar to the Moto G8 one. Galaxy A50 captures a bit better photos and videos than Motorola Moto G8, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Galaxy A50 also has a back camera with a lot higher resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.