Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-03-05 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.35 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.64 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Neon blue and Pearl white | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 237.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50s has an overall score of 86.6, which is much better than the Motorola Moto G8's global score of 74.4. Both devices we compare here use the same Android 10 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't notice any difference regarding that. Galaxy A50s is a lighter and thinner phone than Motorola Moto G8, even though they were released with only a few months difference.
Galaxy A50s counts with a better looking screen than Moto G8, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Galaxy A50s also has a way higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and a way greater quantity of pixels per inch of display. The Galaxy A50s counts with a little bit better performance than Moto G8, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy A50s also has more RAM memory.
The Galaxy A50s takes much better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto G8, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Galaxy A50s also counts with a way more MP back-facing camera. Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with a much better memory to install games and applications than Moto G8, and although they both have a SD card slot that holds up to 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also has 64 GB more internal memory.
Galaxy A50s features a battery life that is very similar to the battery lifetime in Motorola Moto G8.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.