Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.35 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.64 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Neon blue and Pearl white | -- |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 237.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G is a lot better than Moto G8, with a overall score of 91.3 against 74.4. These phones have Android OS, but the Galaxy A52 5G has 12 version and Moto G8 has Android 10 version. The Galaxy A52 5G body is newer and a bit thinner, but a bit heavier than Moto G8. The Galaxy A52 5G has a more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G8, because it has a quite larger screen, a way better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a lot higher pixel amount per inch of display.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Moto G8, because it has more internal storage capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a little bit better hardware performance than Moto G8, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has 2 GB more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a way better camera than Moto G8, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a lot more MP camera. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola Moto G8, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.