Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-05 | 2018-05-22 |
| 6.35 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.64 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Neon blue and Pearl white | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| Plastic | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 237.00 | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A6 is just a bit better than Motorola Moto G8, getting a overall score of 75.8 against 74.4. Despite of the fact that Galaxy A6 is older than the Motorola Moto G8, it's body is lighter and somewhat thinner. The Motorola Moto G8 features a little faster CPU than Galaxy A6, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Motorola Moto G8 also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Galaxy A6 has a little bit better looking screen than Motorola Moto G8, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a little worse resolution of 720 x 1480, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixels density. Moto G8 counts with a much better memory to install applications and games than Galaxy A6, because it has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB and more internal memory capacity.
The Moto G8 features just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A6, and although they both have a 16 mega pixels resolution back facing camera and a same size aperture, the Moto G8 also has a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition. The Moto G8 has superior battery duration than Galaxy A6, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Samsung Galaxy A6 is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.