Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.35 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.64 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Neon blue and Pearl white | Black and White |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 237.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 268 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M51 has an overall score of 87.7, which is better than the Moto G8's 74.4 global score. Despite being the best in our current comparison, it must be told that it's also a just a bit thicker and heavier cellphone. These phones have the same Android 10 OS, so you shouldn't notice any differences regarding OS features.
The Samsung Galaxy M51 counts with a much better display than Moto G8, because it has a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, a higher pixels amount per display inch and a quite larger screen. The Samsung Galaxy M51 features a bit superior CPU than Motorola Moto G8, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also has more RAM memory.
The Galaxy M51 counts with a lot better camera than Moto G8, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low-light images, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the Galaxy M51 also counts with a much more mega pixels back-facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy M51 has a much bigger storage to store more apps and games than Motorola Moto G8, and although they both have a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also has more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy M51 counts with a much better battery life than Moto G8, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.