Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.35 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.64 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Neon blue and Pearl white | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 237.00 | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is much better than the Moto G8, getting a 98.9 score against 74.4. These devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a more recent 13 version and Moto G8 has Android 10 version, so it provides lots of additional features and enhanced performance. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra body is just a bit thinner but a little bit heavier than Moto G8, and they were only released 6 months apart.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a much more vibrant display than Motorola Moto G8, because it has a lot better display pixels density, a way higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 and a quite larger display. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a bit better processor than Moto G8, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has 8 GB more RAM.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto G8, because it has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1000 GB and more internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a way better camera than Moto G8, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for shooting images in low light environments, it also counts with a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution and a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a little longer battery lifetime than Moto G8, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra costs a lot more than the Motorola Moto G8, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.