Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
3G OnlySM-N9000
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.35 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.64 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Neon blue and Pearl white | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 237.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 5 Octa chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A15 (Quad-Core 1900 MHz + Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | ARM Mali-T628 MP6 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 490 hours standby time 20 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 3 has an overall score of 80.7, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto G8's 74.4 overall score. Both phones in our current comparison include Android operating system, but the Galaxy Note 3 has 5.0 version and Motorola Moto G8 has Android 10. Even though Galaxy Note 3 is older than the Motorola Moto G8, it's body is just a little bit thinner and lighter.
Galaxy Note 3 has just a little better performance than Moto G8, because although it has 1 GB less RAM memory, and they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Note 3 also counts with a graphics processor. Galaxy Note 3 has a way better looking display than Moto G8, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher quantity of pixels per screen inch and a better 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution.
The Moto G8 shoots just a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Moto G8 also has a higher resolution back facing camera and a lot larger aperture to capture better low-light images and videos.
Motorola Moto G8 counts with a very superior memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Motorola Moto G8 also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Motorola Moto G8 has superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 3, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3200mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 costs a little more money than Motorola Moto G8, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.