Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-05 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.35 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.64 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Neon blue and Pearl white | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 237.00 | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a bit better than Motorola Moto G8, having an 80.4 score against 74.4. Although the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition is incredibly older than Motorola Moto G8, it's body is thinner and lighter. The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has just a little better hardware performance than Moto G8. Both of them have 8 CPU cores and 4 GB of RAM.
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a much better looking screen than Moto G8, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot more pixels per display inch and a lot higher 1440 x 2560 resolution. Moto G8 has a slightly bigger storage to install games and applications than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Moto G8 also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
Moto G8 takes clearer videos and photos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same camera aperture, the Moto G8 also has a much more MP back facing camera. The Moto G8 features greater battery lifetime than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 25 percent greater battery size.
Although Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Moto G8, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Moto G8. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the Galaxy Note Fan Edition, but if you don't you can save some money and buy the Moto G8, giving up some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.