Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2013-09-25 |
| 6.35 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.64 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Neon blue and Pearl white | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 237.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note3 has a general score of 77.7, which is a bit better than the Moto G8's global score of 74.4. Samsung Galaxy Note3 is an extremely older phone than Moto G8, but it's a little thinner and lighter anyway. Both of these devices include Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Note3 has the newer 4.4.2 version and Moto G8 has Android 10.
Motorola Moto G8 counts with a little faster processor than Galaxy Note3, because it has a larger number of cores (although slower) and a higher amount of RAM memory. Galaxy Note3 counts with a little bit better looking screen than Moto G8, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1080 x 1920 pixels resolution and a greater pixel density.
Motorola Moto G8 features a very superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note3, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Motorola Moto G8 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
The Moto G8 has just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note3, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Moto G8 also has a lot bigger camera aperture and a higher 16 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera. The Moto G8 counts with better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a 25 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.