Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-05 | 2014-09-29 |
| 6.35 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.64 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Neon blue and Pearl white | Black, Gold, Pink and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 237.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 20 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-T760 MP6 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3220mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note4 has a score of 77.6, which is just a bit better than the Moto G8's 74.4 general score. Although the Samsung Galaxy Note4 is older than the Moto G8, it's design is a little lighter and just a little bit thinner. The Motorola Moto G8 features a little faster processing unit than Galaxy Note4, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola Moto G8 also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Galaxy Note4 counts with a brighter display than Moto G8, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a way greater screen pixels density. Galaxy Note4 takes clearer photos and videos than Motorola Moto G8, although it has a way tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for shooting pictures and video in low light situations, they both have the same video frame rates, the same video definition and the same resolution camera in the back.
Moto G8 counts with much more memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note4, because it has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 512 GB and more internal memory capacity. Moto G8 has better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note4, because it has a 24% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.