Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-03-05 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.35 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.64 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Neon blue and Pearl white | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 237.00 | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 is better than Motorola Moto G8, with a global score of 88.3 against 74.4. Galaxy S10's construction is somewhat lighter and thinner than the Motorola Moto G8, despite of the fact that it was released around a year before. These phones come with Android operating system, but Galaxy S10 has a newer 11 version while Motorola Moto G8 has Android 10 version, so it offers some nice extra features and a performance increase.
The Galaxy S10 counts with a little better performance than Motorola Moto G8, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S10 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S10 features a much sharper screen than Motorola Moto G8, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much better 1440 x 3040 resolution and a way greater pixel density.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 counts with a much better storage capacity to install applications and games than Moto G8, and although they both have a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy S10 also has more internal storage. The Galaxy S10 shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto G8, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 video definition and a lot lower resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a larger aperture to take better photography and videos in low light environments.
The Motorola Moto G8 has improved battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S10, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy S10 costs more than Motorola Moto G8, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.