Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-03-05 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.35 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.64 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Neon blue and Pearl white | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 237.00 | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 5G is a lot better than the Motorola Moto G8, getting a 93.6 score against 74.4. Galaxy S10 5G is an older and just a little heavier cellphone than Motorola Moto G8, but Samsung was able to make it somewhat thinner anyway. These devices include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S10 5G has 11 version while Motorola Moto G8 has Android 10.
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a lot better looking display than Moto G8, because it has a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 3040, much more pixels per inch in the screen and a bit larger display. The Galaxy S10 5G features just a little better processing power than Motorola Moto G8, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S10 5G also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with a bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto G8, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy S10 5G counts with a little better battery duration than Moto G8, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G captures a little bit better pictures and videos than Moto G8, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a back facing camera with a much worse resolution, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to take better captures and video in low light situations.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is a lot more expensive than Moto G8, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.