Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-05 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.35 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.64 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Neon blue and Pearl white | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 237.00 | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10e is better than the Moto G8, having a general score of 86.3 against 74.4. Samsung Galaxy S10e is an older device than Moto G8, but Samsung was able to build it much lighter and thinner. The Galaxy S10e counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G8, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S10e also has more RAM.
Galaxy S10e counts with a much better display than Moto G8, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a lot more pixels per inch in the display and a way better 1080 x 2280 pixels resolution. The Galaxy S10e shoots slightly better videos and photos than Motorola Moto G8, because although it has a worse video definition and a camera with a way worse 12 megapixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture for better low-light images and video.
Samsung Galaxy S10e counts with a way bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Motorola Moto G8, and although they both have an external SD slot that holds up to 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also has 64 GB more internal storage capacity. Motorola Moto G8 features better battery life than Galaxy S10e, because it has a 29 percent bigger battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S10e costs a lot more money than Motorola Moto G8, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.