Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.35 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.64 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Neon blue and Pearl white | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 237.00 | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 FE has a general score of 90.8, which is much better than the Moto G8's general score of 74.4. Both devices in this comparison use Android operating system, but the Galaxy S20 FE has a more recent 11 version while Moto G8 has Android 10 version. The Galaxy S20 FE design is a little bit heavier but just a little bit thinner than Moto G8, and both of them were released only 7 months apart.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a more vivid display than Moto G8, because it has a way higher display density, a bit bigger display and a way higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. Galaxy S20 FE has a bit faster processing unit than Motorola Moto G8, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 FE also has more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a lot bigger memory to store more apps and games than Motorola Moto G8, because it has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1000 GB and more internal memory. The Galaxy S20 FE counts with a little better battery duration than Motorola Moto G8, because it has a 13 percent larger battery size.
Galaxy S20 FE counts with just a bit better camera than Moto G8, although it has a much less MP back camera, a worse 3840x2160 video resolution and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low light photography.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE costs a lot more than Moto G8, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.