Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.35 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.64 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Neon blue and Pearl white | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 237.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a score of 98, which is way better than the Motorola Moto G8's overall score of 74.4. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G design has the same thickness than Motorola Moto G8, but it is heavier. Both phones in this review come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has 13 version and Motorola Moto G8 has Android 10 version.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a little bit better processing power than Moto G8, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has more RAM memory. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a much sharper screen than Moto G8, because it has a way better 1440 x 3200 resolution, a way better screen density and a bit bigger screen.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a lot better camera than Moto G8, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for shooting images and videos in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a camera in the back with a much higher 108 megapixels resolution and a much higher video quality.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a superior storage capacity for apps and games than Moto G8, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity and an external SD slot that holds up to 1000 GB. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has longer battery life than Moto G8, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola Moto G8, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola Moto G8. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the Motorola Moto G8, letting go a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.