Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.35 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.64 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Neon blue and Pearl white | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 237.00 | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 has a score of 93.4, which is a lot better than the Moto G8's 74.4 overall score. Both of these devices include Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S22 has a more recent 13 version and Moto G8 has Android 10 version, offering some extra features. The Samsung Galaxy S22 construction is newer, somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than Moto G8.
Samsung Galaxy S22 features a much sharper screen than Moto G8, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a lot greater screen pixel density and a much better 1080 x 2340px resolution. The Motorola Moto G8 counts with a bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy S22, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy S22 counts with a bit faster CPU than Moto G8, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S22 also has a larger amount of RAM. Motorola Moto G8 features just a bit better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S22, because it has an 8% larger battery capacity. The Galaxy S22 features a way better camera than Motorola Moto G8, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for taking pictures or video in low light situations, it also counts with a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a much more megapixels back-facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 costs a lot more than Moto G8, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.