Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.35 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.64 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Neon blue and Pearl white | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 237.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has an overall score of 95.4, which is way better than the Motorola Moto G8's overall score of 74.4. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a somewhat heavier phone than Motorola Moto G8, but both of them have the same thickness. Both devices in this comparison review use Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has 13 version and Motorola Moto G8 has Android 10 version, so it provides a lot of extra features.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features just a little better processing power than Moto G8, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a much sharper screen than Moto G8, because it has a little bit bigger screen, a much better pixels quantity per inch of display and a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels.
The Motorola Moto G8 counts with a bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a greater camera than Moto G8, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, it also counts with a lot higher video definition and a back camera with much more megapixels.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with greater battery duration than Moto G8, because it has a 25% greater battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Moto G8, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Moto G8. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, else you can save some dollars and buy the Moto G8, resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.