Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-03-05 | -- |
| 6.35 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | -- |
| 6.64 ounces | -- |
| Neon blue and Pearl white | -- |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 237.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 is better than Moto G8, having a overall score of 82.6 against 74.4. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S25 has a newer 14 version and Moto G8 has Android 10, counting with a couple nice extra features and improved performance. The Galaxy S25 is a notably thinner and way lighter cellphone than the Moto G8.
Moto G8 has a much greater hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy S25 features a much more vibrant display than Motorola Moto G8, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better screen density and a much better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels.
The Galaxy S25 has a lot better camera than Motorola Moto G8, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, it also counts with a way higher resolution back camera and a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality. Moto G8 features a quite bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S25, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 512 GB.
The Moto G8 and the Galaxy S25 feature really similar batteries performance.
Although Galaxy S25 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Moto G8, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Moto G8. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the Galaxy S25, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Moto G8, letting go a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.