Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-05 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.35 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.64 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Neon blue and Pearl white | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 237.00 | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S7 Active has a general score of 75.8, which is a little bit better than Motorola Moto G8's 74.4 general score. The Galaxy S7 Active body is just a bit lighter than Motorola Moto G8, although it's somewhat thicker and was released many years before. Motorola Moto G8 counts with a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Motorola Moto G8 also has a higher number of cores.
Galaxy S7 Active counts with a much better looking screen than Motorola Moto G8, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a lot better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a much better screen density. Motorola Moto G8 features a superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 32 GB more internal memory capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy S7 Active and Moto G8 count with really similar battery durations. Moto G8 counts with just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same video frame rate, the same video quality and a same size aperture, the Moto G8 also has a much more mega-pixels back facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy S7 Active is a little more expensive than the Moto G8, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.