Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-03-05 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.35 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.64 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Neon blue and Pearl white | Black |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| $ 237.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 268 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a score of 80.1, which is slightly better than Motorola Moto G8's global score of 74.4. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a newer 8.0 Oreo version while Motorola Moto G8 has Android 10 version, so it provides the user some nice extra features. Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a incredibly heavier and extremely thicker cellphone than the Motorola Moto G8.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with just a little better processing power than Moto G8. Both have the same number of cores and a 4 GB RAM. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a much sharper screen than Moto G8, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a way better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a way greater pixels number per display inch.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro's memory capacity to install games and applications is just as good as the Motorola Moto G8 one, they have a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 512 GB and the same 64 GB internal memory. Moto G8 takes way better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for low-light images and video, it also counts with a lot higher video quality and a back facing camera with a way better 16 mega pixels resolution.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a little better battery duration than Moto G8, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Although Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Moto G8, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Moto G8. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get the Moto G8, giving up a few specs and features, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.