Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.35 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.64 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Neon blue and Pearl white | Black |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 237.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 268 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is just a bit better than Moto G8, having a score of 81 against 74.4. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is a somewhat heavier and thicker phone than Moto G8. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has newer 11 version and Moto G8 has Android 10 version.
The Galaxy XCover Pro has a much better looking screen than Motorola Moto G8, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher pixel density and a much better 1080 x 2340 resolution. The Galaxy XCover Pro and Moto G8 both have very similar memory for games and applications, they have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory and a SD card slot that allows up to 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a little faster processing unit than Moto G8. Both have 4 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core processing unit. Galaxy XCover Pro's camera is just as good as Moto G8's camera, and although the Galaxy XCover Pro has a back-facing camera with a much better 25 mega pixels resolution, they both have the same 1920x1080 video quality, the same 30 fps video frame rate and a same size diafragm aperture.
The Galaxy XCover Pro features a bit better battery life than Motorola Moto G8, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Moto G8, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Moto G8. If you prefer to save some money, you can get the Moto G8, letting go a few specs and features, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.