Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.35 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.64 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Neon blue and Pearl white | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| $ 237.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has an overall score of 88.5, which is much better than Moto G8's score of 74.4. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip's body is thinner and a little bit lighter than Moto G8, even though they were released with only 1 months difference. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has 12 version while Moto G8 has Android 10, providing the user some additional features and optimized performance.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit more powerful processor than Moto G8, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy Z Flip counts with a sharper screen than Moto G8, because it has a way higher pixels quantity per inch of display, a quite bigger screen and a way better resolution of 1080 x 2636.
The Galaxy Z Flip has more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Moto G8, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory. Galaxy Z Flip captures slightly better videos and photos than Moto G8, although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for shooting photos or video in low-light environments, a worse video definition and a camera in the back with a much worse resolution.
The Motorola Moto G8 features longer battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Although Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Moto G8, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Moto G8. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy Moto G8, giving up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.