Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.35 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.64 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Neon blue and Pearl white | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| $ 237.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a general score of 92.3, which is much better than the Moto G8's 74.4 score. Even when the Galaxy Z Flip 5G and Moto G8 were only released 5 months apart, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G is thinner and just a little bit lighter. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a newer 11 version while Moto G8 has Android 10, giving you lots of additional features.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a brighter screen than Moto G8, because it has a much greater display pixels density, a little bit bigger screen and a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2636 pixels. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a bit faster CPU than Motorola Moto G8, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has more storage for games and applications than Motorola Moto G8, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a little bit better camera than Moto G8, although it has a smaller camera aperture, a way less mega pixels resolution back-facing camera and a worse (4K) video definition.
Moto G8 counts with improved battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G costs a lot more money than the Moto G8, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.