Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.35 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.64 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Neon blue and Pearl white | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 237.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a lot better than the Motorola Moto G8, getting a 94.6 score against 74.4. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2's design is way thinner but much heavier than Motorola Moto G8, and they were released only a couple of months apart. Both of these phones have Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a more recent 11 version while Motorola Moto G8 has Android 10.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a brighter display than Moto G8, because it has a lot higher resolution of 1768 x 2208, a bigger screen and a better display pixels density. Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a better storage to install applications and games than Moto G8, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a little better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G8, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a larger amount of RAM. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a slightly better camera than Motorola Moto G8, although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a tinier diafragm aperture and a back camera with a much lower resolution.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a bit superior battery life than Motorola Moto G8, because it has a 13 percent larger battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola Moto G8, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola Moto G8. If you are trying to save some money, you can get the Motorola Moto G8, giving up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.